Hi Andy!

On Mi, 25 Jul 2012, Andy Wokula wrote:

> Am 25.07.2012 15:06, schrieb Bram Moolenaar:
> >Patch 7.3.610
> >Problem:    Cannot operate on the text that a search pattern matches.
> >Solution:   Add the "gn" and "gN" commands. (Christian Brabandt)
> >Files:           runtime/doc/index.txt, runtime/doc/visual.txt, src/normal.c,
> >         src/proto/search.pro, src/search.c, src/testdir/test53.in,
> >         src/testdir/test53.ok
> 
> * zero-width patterns
>     /$
>     dgn
>   joins lines (intended?)
> 
>     /^
>     dgn
>   deletes the current line, up to and including the first char of the
>   next line
> 
>     /\zs
>     dgn
>   deletes 3 characters

Attached patch, should catch correctly zero-width patterns.

regards,
Christian
-- 

-- 
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
diff --git a/src/search.c b/src/search.c
--- a/src/search.c
+++ b/src/search.c
@@ -3418,6 +3418,9 @@
     int		visual_active = FALSE;
     int		flags = 0;
     pos_T	save_VIsual;
+    regmmatch_T regmatch;
+    int		nmatched = 0;
+    int		zerowidth = FALSE;
 
 
     /* wrapping should not occur */
@@ -3452,6 +3455,25 @@
     else
 	orig_pos = pos = start_pos = curwin->w_cursor;
 
+    /* check for zero-width pattern */
+    if (search_regcomp(spats[last_idx].pat, RE_SEARCH, RE_SEARCH,
+		   ((SEARCH_HIS + SEARCH_KEEP)), &regmatch) == FAIL)
+	return FAIL;
+
+    /* zero-width pattern should match everywhere... */
+    nmatched = vim_regexec_multi(&regmatch, curwin, curbuf,
+				curwin->w_cursor.lnum, (colnr_T)0,
+				NULL);
+    if (called_emsg)
+	return FAIL;
+
+    if (nmatched && regmatch.startpos[0].lnum == 0
+		 && regmatch.endpos[0].lnum == 0
+	         && regmatch.endpos[0].col == regmatch.startpos[0].col
+       )
+	zerowidth = TRUE;
+    vim_free(regmatch.regprog);
+
     /*
      * The trick is to first search backwards and then search forward again,
      * so that a match at the current cursor position will be correctly
@@ -3459,17 +3481,22 @@
      */
     for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
     {
-	if (i && count == 1)
-	    flags = SEARCH_START;
+	/* if (i && count == 1))
+         flags = SEARCH_START; */
 
 	if (forward)
 	    dir = i;
 	else
 	    dir = !i;
+
+	flags = 0;
+
+	if (!dir && !zerowidth)
+	    flags = SEARCH_END;
+
 	result = searchit(curwin, curbuf, &pos, (dir ? FORWARD : BACKWARD),
 		spats[last_idx].pat, (long) (i ? count : 1),
-		SEARCH_KEEP | flags | (dir ? 0 : SEARCH_END),
-		RE_SEARCH, 0, NULL);
+		SEARCH_KEEP | flags, RE_SEARCH, 0, NULL);
 
 	/* First search may fail, but then start searching from the
 	 * beginning of the file (cursor might be on the search match)
@@ -3500,10 +3527,14 @@
     }
 
     start_pos = pos;
-    flags = (forward ? SEARCH_END : 0);
-
-    /* move to match */
-    result = searchit(curwin, curbuf, &pos, (forward ? FORWARD : BACKWARD),
+    flags = 0;
+
+    if (forward)
+	flags |= SEARCH_END;
+
+    if (!zerowidth)
+    /* move to match, except for zero-width matches, in which case, we are already on the next match */
+	result = searchit(curwin, curbuf, &pos, (forward ? FORWARD : BACKWARD),
 	    spats[last_idx].pat, 0L, flags | SEARCH_KEEP, RE_SEARCH, 0, NULL);
 
     if (!VIsual_active)

Raspunde prin e-mail lui