Hi!
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 08:29:39AM -0800, Ben Fritz wrote:
> Maybe just match the \\\n sequences as a separate syntax item and use
> nextgroup to enforce ordering. It should work (probably even a little
> bit faster) and also simplify your pattern.
As far as I understood, nextgroup is just a recommendation, while I've
tried to implement more strict syntax checking "after that item can be
only this one, and after this there can be only one of these items, etc.".
Maybe I'm wrong in trying to go this way, because it's syntax highlighter,
not real parser/compiler, it may be a little relaxed…
--
WBR, Alex.
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
