On Thursday, December 13, 2012 3:28:26 PM UTC-6, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > So8res wrote: > > > > > The \i and \k regex character classes are very useful, matching > > > identifier and keyword characters respectively. You might think that > > > \I and \K match non-(identifier,keyword) characters, but that is not > > > what they do. > > > > > > As far as I can tell, there's no (easy) way in a regex to match > > > non-identifier/non-keyword characters. > > > > > > I propose adding such character classes, potentially under the names > > > \_i and \_k. I'm not entirely satisfied with those. Any other > > > suggestions for names? > > > > > > (Alternatively, is there a way to do this that I couldn't find in the help?) > > > > Right, it's not easy to match the opposite of \i and \k. > > > > \_ is reserved for items including a line break. > > > > Perhaps we can make a generic solution with \- meaning "the opposite > > of". At least instead of finding the few characters that don't have a > > meaning yet. >
What about instead of trying to find characters to pair with a \, we just define new classes similar to [[:alnum:]] like [[:identifier:]] and [[:keyword:]] and maybe [[:fname:]]. Then non-matches would just use negation with [^...] just like other character classes. -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
