On 26-Jan-13 23:36:02 +0100, Christian Brabandt wrote: > Hi Ingo! > > On Sa, 26 Jan 2013, Ingo Karkat wrote: > >> I find the new proposed behavior somewhat unexpected (though I rarely >> use :#); you had to press <C-U> to get rid of the '<,'>, and that >> signals to me that visual mode is done. >> >> Instead of G, you can use :# today as well; it's just more typing: >> V:<C-U>1500<CR>V'< > > The new behaviour would only work, with '<,'> in front of the line > number. If you press <C-U> it wouldn't work and would work as before.
Ah, okay, that mitigates my concerns. It's a quite strange syntax, and I probably wouldn't have been able to deduce the behavior upon seeing :'<,'>1500 before this discussion, but if it helps you (and others), you'd have my blessing :-) -- regards, ingo -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
