> I suggest you do not send a diff in the body.  Just a unified diff in
> the attachment will do.
> 
> Also, you do not really need to include the diff for src/auto/configure.
> If you do, please use the same version of autoconf, otherwise we get all
> these irrelevant differences.

“make autoconf” does not support specfying exact version, and due to the 
location of configure script autoconf-wrapper fails to guess the correct 
version.

And with the following patch:

diff -r dd91804ae7ec src/Makefile
--- a/src/Makefile      Sun Jan 27 04:43:03 2013 +0400
+++ b/src/Makefile      Mon Jan 28 07:56:26 2013 +0400
@@ -1697,7 +1697,7 @@
 # - Uses ">config.log" instead of "./config.log".
 autoconf:
        if test ! -f configure.save; then mv configure configure.save; fi
-       autoconf
+       WANT_AUTOCONF="2.1" autoconf
        sed -e 's+>config.log+>auto/config.log+' -e 
's+\./config.log+auto/config.log+' configure > auto/configure
        chmod 755 auto/configure
        mv -f configure.save configure

it just fails with

autoconf: Undefined macros:      
configure.in:1007:      AC_MSG_RESULT(too old)

(and a big bunch of complains about further AC_MSG_RESULT and AC_MSG_ERROR). 
Autoconf version is 2.13 in this case.

It fails on upstream, not only on my changes.

-- 
-- 
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php



Raspunde prin e-mail lui