On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Charles E Campbell < [email protected]> wrote:
> Ben Fritz wrote: > >> I only rarely edit files with 10000 or more lines. Most of the time for >> me, my 'rnu' column takes 4 columns, and my 'nu' column takes 5. I don't >> care about the extra width, and would probably never turn off the option to >> show the absolute number on the current line if there were such an option. >> I'd support doing it that way always, but I'd accept an option as well. >> >> When some users of some simulation s/w I helped write have a problem, I > usually end up with 10-150G long debugging traces; I usually break these up > into 1G chunks and "edit" (more usually, examine) these. So I often end up > with files having considerably more than 10,000 lines in them. Since the > patch has been accepted which installs the current line number, I'll > probably just use my RltvNmbr plugin instead. > > > I am in this exact situation: wc -l xaa2.sql 19,461,476 xaa2.sql I think the patch should be "smart" enough. If the current line number exceeds available space, simply put a 0. If it will fit in the space alloted, put the current line number. Maybe it already does this? My 2 cents. David -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
