Ben Fritz wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 13, 2013 4:57:15 PM UTC-6, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> >
> >
> > Ok. But my idea is to have it included and only use it, if users
> >
> > explicitly set the 'experimental' option. So by default users would
> >
> > still use the old, working RE, but users that like to test and
> >
> > contribute can enable the new RE engine so that the new RE engine can be
> >
> > tested more easily.
> >
>
> I like this idea. I'd be happy to turn the option on and run with it
> as long as I had the ability to revert to the old mode when needed if
> I run into a problem. Then we also don't need to worry about a
> whitelist. Just keep it as an "experimental" feature and people know
> to turn it off (and submit a bug report!) if they run into situations
> where it doesn't work.
Question is, if you run into a problem, how do you know you have to turn
off that option? If syntax highlighting is off it might be obvious, but
when some plugins behave badly you might not have a clue.
--
[The rest of the ARMY stand around looking at a loss.]
INSPECTOR END OF FILM: (picks up megaphone) All right! Clear off! Go on!
"Monty Python and the Holy Grail" PYTHON (MONTY) PICTURES LTD
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.