Gary Johnson wrote: > Won't that break any plugins that use 'n' or 'N' after a > reverse search? > > I agree that the proposed behavior would be less confusing > than the current behavior, but changing it in any way that > would break existing scripts seems like a non-starter.
There are times when moving forward requires breaks from the past. While various scripts might fail, the people who choose to switch on this option can deal with that. Vim should not default to setting a new option that would break scripts, but people can choose to turn it on. John -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
