Yasuhiro Matsumoto wrote:
> We updated c.vim / cpp.vim for support C++11.
>
> https://github.com/vim-jp/cpp-vim
>
> In the final analysis, we dropped syntax of ternary operator in C++11.
>
> https://github.com/vim-jp/cpp-vim/issues/7
>
> If lambda is contained in ternary operator, syntax become too complex.
> So if user doesn't set cpp_no_cpp11=1 on cpp filetype, syntax of
> ternary operator will be disabled.
This uses the variable cpp_no_cpp11. Can we document this?
There also is c_no_c11, I suppose that has a different meaning.
--
It's totally unfair to suggest - as many have - that engineers are socially
inept. Engineers simply have different objectives when it comes to social
interaction.
(Scott Adams - The Dilbert principle)
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
