Hi Markus,
On 09.03.2013 15:26, Markus Pargmann wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 03:07:35PM +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
>> Hi Markus,
>>
>> On 09.03.2013 13:41, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>>>
>>> Markus Pargmann wrote:
>>>
>>>> Small improvement to highlight nodes with addresses in devicetree files.
>>
>> Can you give me an example of such a node, so I can reproduce this here
>> and test you patch?
>
> The first one is an example for nodes without addresses, so not
> highlighted. The second one has an address in its name ('@10001000').
Hmm, why wouldn't you want them *all* highlighted? Wouldn't that be even
nicer? IOW, why not treat all symbols that are followed by a "{" as a node?
Thanks,
Daniel
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
