Hi Christian, On Tuesday, March 12, 2013 9:16:04 PM UTC+1, Christian Brabandt wrote: > Ah, I see, this only happens when sourcing as a script. The problem here > is, that there is a subtle difference between the :@ command and the > :normal! @ command. When using the :@ command, the register will be > called for the range of the folded lines and therefore implicitly sets > the range to the first and lastline of the fold and then the ex_at() > function explicitly sets the cursorline to the endline of the register.
yes, I saw the problem. > We could change it, but the documentation explicitly states, that in the > future the register will be executed for the range given, so we should > rather just implement this ;) Unfortunately, the expression "in the future" is very relative generally speaking and with Vim in particular. For the present, the documentation only requires that the cursor will be set to [addr]: "set cursor at line [addr] (default is current line)". So, as far as I understand, this issue is easily fixed by removing the WHOLEFOLD flag from CMD_at and CMD_star, at least until somebody actually implements the promised functionality. See the attached patch. -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
atcommand-fold-addr.patch
Description: Binary data
