On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 04:39:11PM -0700, Kana Natsuno wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 7:21 AM, Sung Pae wrote:
>
> > The motion mappings created by the above function work with both
> > native operators and with the custom operators provided by two other
> > plugins by Tim Pope: vim-surround and vim-commentary.
>
> Really? Suppose that we invoke a new Vim process with the following
> environment:
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, this combination does fail due to the implementation of the `ys`
operator. This can be ameliorated, but it would not be pretty.
Other combinations do not fail (like the `gc` vim-commentary operator
with the `af` text object), and the native operators with custom text
objects work well.
Again, this is a hack against the constraints of the bug you have
pointed out, which I am very much in favor of seeing fixed. Do you have
a patch to supply to the list, or should I look into it?
Sung Pae
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
