Christian, thanks for looking into this. On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Christian Brabandt <cbli...@256bit.org> wrote: > On Mi, 27 Mär 2013, glts wrote: >> d:call<Esc> >> >> This command has no effect. > > But it doesn't really abort.
I don't understand. The command is cancelled silently, just as it is when you cancel other Operator-pending commands, e.g. "d3<Esc>". This is what I would expect. > Here is a patch, that checks, whether the ex command could be executed > and also whether the command possibly generated an error. I don't think this is the right solution. The behaviour should be the same as for other Operator-pending commands: "d<Esc>", "dv<Esc>", "d:<Esc>". This isn't erroneous input and we don't want Vim to beep. David -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
