On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 1:17 AM, John Little <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, with one, but the test would not have found the problem (with more than > one combining char) that you fixed with the second patch. I just meant to > suggest that the test have such a character. If someone could find a > character with more, that would be interesting, though the test might then > interact with the 'maxcombine' option.
For better test coverage, I added two more characters to the test, with two and three combining characters, respectively (real examples). I didn't study the patch, though. -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
register-comb-char-newtest.diff
Description: Binary data
