ZyX wrote: > In addition to vim.buffers[i] being pretty useless (it uses index of > internal buffer linked list which user should not know about at all) > it also adds a convenient way to obtain buffer by its number. Ability > to iterate using `:py for b in vim.buffers` is lost, but I will readd > it a few patches after.
Isn't this breaking backwards compatibility? We would need to check what Python plugins this breaks. -- If you're sending someone Styrofoam, what do you pack it in? /// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
