On 02-May-2013 16:29 +0200, Christian Brabandt wrote: > [100 lines deleted] > > It looks like a useful addition, but I am not sure, whether a new > function is the right way to go, instead of fixing redir.
I fully agree, it would be better if :redir could be fixed; even with my proposed inclusion of split()ing into lines, the additional benefit is low, and it will take a long time until plugins can fully benefit from that function without a compatibility wrapper. Because I'm still mostly ignorant of the Vim source code, I had assumed the patch author has found fixing :redir too difficult (as it also / mostly handles file and register targets where there indeed will be issues with overriding); I hope mattn can shed some light on that. -- regards, ingo -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
