Hi Bram! On Sa, 11 Mai 2013, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> > The plan is to include a new regexp engine in Vim 7.4. For testing > I would like to get a lot of files for which we have syntax > highlighting. I can then compare the highlighting of these files with > the old and the new engine to find anything that is not compatible. > > Please send me a file that exercises most regexp patterns in the syntax > file. It doesn't need to be long, but it should be a complex example of > the language. Send it as an attachment to avoid the white space being > messed up by the mail system. > > I would prefer one file per syntax, but it must be valid syntax. If one > file is problematic (e.g., you can't concatenate small files without > making it invalid), then a few files would be OK. A rough goal would be > 1000 lines. > > At some later point we might also want to do performance measurements. > Although I already have a few "bad" examples for that. > > IMPORTANT: I will distribute the collection of files, so that others can > reproduce problems, do performance measurements, etc. Make sure your > file has a copyright that permits this. Don't reveal any secrets, > patents, trademarks, etc. A line stating that the Vim license applies > should be sufficient. How are maintainers supposed to test unofficial syntax files (e.g. syntax files not distributed with vim)? regards, Christian -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
