Ken Takata wrote: > 2013/05/11 Sat 5:25:21 UTC+9 Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > Ken Takata wrote: > > > > > 2013/05/10 Fri 10:21:37 UTC+9 mattn wrote: > > > > On Friday, May 10, 2013 3:55:02 AM UTC+9, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > > > > > https://code.google.com/p/vim-soc2008-regexp/wiki/nfa_bugs > > > > > > > > > > Andrei (the student who worked on this) does mention multi-byte. He > > > > > says it slows down the execution, thus the multi-byte support should > > > > > be > > > > > there. We need to find the latest version of the code. > > > > > > > > vim72-re ? > > > > > > I have updated Andrei's patch for 7.3.929. > > > https://bitbucket.org/k_takata/vim-soc2008-regexp-mq/src/438636dfa7c6faa41b5f1281c7a931f6938c64df/vim-soc2008-regexp.diff?at=default > > > > > > I also fixed the following: > > > * Couldn't compile with VC10. > > > * Update makefiles for Windows. (Make_cyg.mak, Make_ming.mak and > > > Make_mvc.mak) > > > * Some typos. > > > * Indents. > > > > Thanks! > > > > > Maybe we need more work and testing... > > > > Definitely. My plan is to collect a large number of files for supported > > syntax. Then compare the highlighting with the old and the new engine. > > I expect this the toughest way to verify regexp patterns work properly. > > > > Another thing to do is checking performance. Andrei already noticed > > that the new engine can be twice as slow as the old one. We either need > > to make it faster or use the old engine where it is faster. > > I have updated the regexp patch: > https://bitbucket.org/k_takata/vim-soc2008-regexp-mq/src/0ba4d0226d1d83cb30b7b2474d06c69b324e9692/vim-soc2008-regexp.diff?at=default > > Two items are fixed: > * Fix compile error with VC10 when DEBUG is defined. > * Fix indents. > > The latest patch will be available at: > https://bitbucket.org/k_takata/vim-soc2008-regexp-mq/src/tip/vim-soc2008-regexp.diff?at=default > ("tip" is used as a commit ID.) > > I tested whether this new engine supports multibyte or not. > I tried with enc=utf-8 and enc=cp932. It seems to work.
Thanks! Hopefully I can start integrating the patch coming weekend. -- I'm sure that I asked CBuilder to do a "full" install. Looks like I got a "fool" install, instead. Charles E Campbell, Jr, PhD /// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
