Troydm wrote:
> On Sunday, May 19, 2013 1:23:23 AM UTC+4, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> >
> >
> > That's a bug. The check for the line is to avoid going outside of the
> >
> > available lines when the text has changed.
> >
>
> You mean check_cursor_col() call is to check for the line to avoid
> going outside of the available lines when text has changed i presume?
> So what is the proposed fix?
>
> commenting/removing this line?
> curwin->w_cursor = save_cursor;
Well, if text got deleted the saved cursor position may no longer be
valid.
Hmm, that would be a problem though. If the autocommand removed text
and positioned the cursor where it should be it will be restored in the
wrong position.
Most InsertEnter autocommands will not change text, restoring the cursor
is useful then. But we need some way to avoid restoring the cursor.
We could use the v:char variable perhaps.
--
There is no right or wrong, there is only your personal opinion.
(Bram Moolenaar)
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
