пятница, 31 мая 2013 г., 20:39:15 UTC+4 пользователь mattn написал:
> In addional, my patch don't remove feature that passing 'func name'.
It would be better if it removed it. As I said, do make the difference between
sort(list, 'Func') and sort(list, '{expr}') defined explicitely: sort(list,
'{expr}', 'expr'); sort(list, '{expr}', 0); sort(list, '{expr}', 0, 1) or
whatever but definitely *not* sort(list, '{expr}').
I did not argue against the feature: I only said that I would like map() and
filter() accept function references more then your extension for sort(). I do
argue against exact implementation.
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
