Hi Bram!
On So, 02 Jun 2013, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> There is too much discussion about this. I think the current behavior
> is OK and does not have enough disadvantage to justify adding yet
> another option.
Note, that latest patch I sent, does not require an extra option, is
rather small, makes the code much more readable (imho) and we can even
get rid of test89.
regards,
Christian
--
Ich leider nicht, meine Freunde; aber ich fühle eine gewisse
Schwierigkeit zu existieren.
-- Bernard Le Bovier de Fontenelle
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
