On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Bram Moolenaar <[email protected]> wrote: > > Axel Bender wrote: > >> I could probably live with the slowing down if it only affected re=2. >> But it also affects re=1 which is not acceptable. The effect is quite >> noticeable, 13 to 20 secs that's a lot. I hope that Bram goes into >> that... > > There are no changes to the old regexp engine that would make it slower. > Note that you need to set 'regexpengine' before opening a file, syntax > items are cached. > > If you can reproduce slowness with 'regexpengine' set to 1, please let > us know how to reproduce that. Please make sure the context (esp. any > plugins, fold settings, etc.) are identical. Different runtime files > also matter a lot.
There is a clear slowdown using regexpengine=0 with v7-3-1088 (slow) and v7-3-1087 (faster). The speed difference when paging up/down is noticeable enough using the files in the attachment above. I don't notice any slowdown with regexpengine=1. -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
