Excerpts from Shougo's message of Sat Jun 08 19:09:04 +0200 2013: > How is the Go language? > I think Go is similar to Zimbu. > What are Zimbu advantages compared from Go language? Same problem about Go/whatever? How to upgrade without rewriting everything?
I'm not asking for a full rewrite, just want to know which is the best way to have collections - a primitive used very frequently by all kinds of software. http://vim-wiki.mawercer.de/wiki/index.html -> improving-language-or-usage-of-it -> breaking-with-the-past (why I'd do so: the list is small, and I think fixing is better than breaking). I added this page for the sake of completeness. If we go that route, we also have to discuss joining any of the existing editors, such as - yzis - yi (Haskell has its flaws, too, so why not settle on "rewriting yi using disciple ?" - or haxe.org (for portibility) - .. (mostly kidding here - possibilities are endless) Ok Bram, we can continue discussing go vs zimbu vs X. But till developers have settled on something (:-)) I'd be interested in a brief list about options you'd consider "acceptable" providing any kind of short abstraction for collections using C. Marc Weber -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
