Dominique Pelle wrote:
> These 2 commands which only differ by using re=1 or re=2
> do not highlight the same text. It's correct with re=2 and
> incorrect with re=1 (with re=1, the second line is not
> entirely highlighted, but it should be):
>
> $ vim -u NONE --noplugin -N -c 'set hls re=1' \
> -c 'call
> feedkeys("aaaa\<cr>aaa\<cr>bbb\<cr>\<esc>/^.\\(.\\).\\_..\\1.\<cr>")'
>
> $ vim -u NONE --noplugin -N -c 'set hls re=2' \
> -c 'call
> feedkeys("aaaa\<cr>aaa\<cr>bbb\<cr>\<esc>/^.\\(.\\).\\_..\\1.\<cr>")'
>
> It was fine in vim-7.3.1190 and the regression
> started in 7.3.1191. It's also broken in the latest
> vim-7.3.1195.
Thanks for reporting. It's easy to fix, but this shows multi-line
patterns need more testing, also with the old engine.
--
hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict:
212. Your Internet group window has more icons than your Accessories window.
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
