On 15-Jun-2013 Mats Bertil Tegner <[email protected]> wrote: > On 06/15/2013 03:10 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > > >Patch 7.3.1196 > >Problem: Old regexp engine does not match pattern with backref correctly. > > (Dominique Pelle) > >Solution: Fix setting status. Test multi-line patterns better. > >Files: src/regexp.c, src/testdir/test64.in, src/testdir/test64.ok > > This patch fails for me on Slackware Linux 64-bit: > I have gzipped all the patches and patch the source with: [...]
For a long time now Vim has been available in an official, publicly available Mercurial repository. I have no idea why in 2013 you would want to use patches. Why don't you give Mercurial a try; it's more reliable (as this very case illustrates) and much easier to use. And most importantly – I believe that Bram's valuable and limited time could be better spent than on preparing patches and fixing problems with their generation. HTH, Lech -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
