On Jul 6, 2013 12:34 AM, "Charles Campbell" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
> Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>>
>> Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
>>
>>> On Jul 4, 2013 10:25 PM, "Bram Moolenaar" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> It's the other way around: On MS-Windows you can do:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>          :e foo\$bar
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That is editing the file "$bar" in directory "foo".  On Unix this has
>>>
>>> a
>>>>>>
>>>>>> different meaning, editing file "foo$bar", thus not using $bar as an
>>>>>> environment variable. That's why test 97 won't work on MS-Windows.
>>>>>
>>>>> I had a problem with expand(fnameescape('$HOME')): here '$HOME' is
>>>
>>> assumed
>>>>>
>>>>> to be ./$HOME and fnameescape() does not cope with this. Same for
>>>
>>> ./a$HOME:
>>>>>
>>>>> it tries to edit either ./aC:... (which is impossible due to
requirement
>>>>> not to have colon in the filename) or ./a/$HOME. There is a bug here.
>>>>
>>>> It's a problem, since:
>>>>
>>>>          :e $HOME
>>>>
>>>> Means to expand the environment variable $HOME, while
>>>>
>>>>          :e \$HOME
>>>>
>>>> Might mean editing the file "$HOME" in the current drive.
>>>>
>>>> Backslash escaping just doesn't work here.  Perhaps we should require
>>>> Windows style environment variables:
>>>>
>>>>          :e %HOME%
>>>>
>>>> That's not backwards compatible though.
>>>
>>> I would suggest different kind of escaping: $$ will mean a single $. Not
>>> the best as it adds different meaning to $, but since backslash was
>>> partially released from its regular meaning (escape character) it is the
>>> best I can deduce.
>>
>> Yeah, using $$HOME where $HOME is meant literally would probably work
>> best.  But it's very difficult to make all pieces of the code, with
>> environment variable expansion and wildcard handling work properly.
>> I'll make it a todo item.
>>
> May I point out that, under both Korn shell and Bash, $$ expands to the
process pid; currently it appears to do nothing under vim, though.

It was taken specifically for this reason: if it did expand to PID I would
not suggest it. If you have better suggestion for an alternate escape
variant please post it here.

> Regards,
> Chip Campbell
>
> --
> --
> You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
> Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
> For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
>
> --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "vim_dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>

-- 
-- 
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Raspunde prin e-mail lui