Ken Takata wrote:
> Vim's patch number is normally three-digit and zero-padded. (e.g. 7.4a.009)
> But when I see the result of :intro, it is zero-suppressed.
> (e.g. version 7.4a.9 BETA) Is this intended?
> I think it's better to use same representation.
Well, applying the "shorter is better" rule: let's keep it as it is.
--
Wi n0t trei a h0liday in Sweden thi yer?
"Monty Python and the Holy Grail" PYTHON (MONTY) PICTURES LTD
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
