Ingo Karkat wrote:
> Hello Vim developers,
>
> Good news first: patch 7.4a.032 indeed fixes the reported NFA-regexp
> problem I've encountered in my test suite.
>
> Bad news: Now, another test case in the same test suite fails. Taking a
> cue from glts's great work at simplifying my previous error case, I've
> condensed it to this:
>
> function! Test(re)
> return 'SuR' =~ '\%#=' . a:re . '\%(\U\@<=S\k*\|S\l\)R'
> endfunction
> for n in [0, 1]
> echo Test(n)
> endfor
>
> To reproduce, use above scriptlet or the identical attached script:
>
> vim -N -u NONE -S bad-re2.vim
> 0
> 1
>
> This is again with a huge build of Vim 7.4a.35, running in an Ubuntu
> 13.04 x64 VM.
Thanks for the example.
--
It's totally unfair to suggest - as many have - that engineers are socially
inept. Engineers simply have different objectives when it comes to social
interaction.
(Scott Adams - The Dilbert principle)
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
