Pokey Rule wrote:
> I run vim with no file on the command-line, so that it shows the
> scratch buffer. When I then run
>
> :e foo
>
> to edit file 'foo', there is a BufUnload event triggered for file
> 'foo'. Here is a test vim command that I use to demonstrate the issue:
>
> autocmd BufUnload * echom "Unloaded " . expand("<afile>")
>
> I posted this issue to stackoverflow, where user Ingo Karkat responded:
>
> I can reproduce this with the latest Vim 7.4a.39. I guess this has to
> do with the fact that Vim reuses the initial scratch buffer number (1)
> for the first :edited file. Please report this problem to the vim_dev
> mailing list.
Thanks, I'll add a note to the todo list.
--
hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict:
8. You spend half of the plane trip with your laptop on your lap...and your
child in the overhead compartment.
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
