On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Manuel Ortega <[email protected]>wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Gary Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> This should be detected by both of the following patterns in
>> $VIMRUNTIME/filetype.vim:
>>
>>     mutt[[:alnum:]_-]\{6\}
>>     mutt[[:alnum:]._-]\{6\}
>>
>> Both of those patterns successfully match "muttV1LGjR" when it
>> appears as a string in a file and the pattern is used after a /
>> command.
>>
>> That's as far as I've investigated this.
>>
>
> I did some snooping.  First, I can confirm the problem on OSX 10.8.4.
>  Second, bisection has revealed that the commit that caused the issue is
> 7.3.1295.  7.3.1294 and earlier are OK.  As to what it is about 1295 that
> did it, I have zero relevant expertise.
>

>From vimgrepping in $VIMRUNTIME/filetype.vim, I see that mutt patterns are
the ONLY ones that include, in the pattern for the BufNewFile,BufRead
autocmds, backslash-escaped curly braces.

And I can see by looking at the diffs for 7.3.1295 (the offending patch) in
the googlecode page, that in fileio.c, there is a note that says "An
escaped { must be unescaped", followed by some code that (I presume) does
just that.  There's the problem.

By the way, I am a bit surprised that the aforementioned patterns in
filetype.vim EVER worked.  Nothing in :h autocmd-pattern or :h file-pattern
suggests that the vim text regex elements '\{' or '\}'---used as
quantifiers like with \{6\} or \{-n\}--- are kosher for use in autocmds.
 Instead those help files seem to say that we only have a relatively small
set of patterns that are only slightly better than globbing wildcards.

For that matter, the mutt patterns are part of a grand total of FOUR that
try to use something like [:alnum:] in them, and nothing in the help files
says *that* should work either!

Are the docs underselling what's available for use in autocmd file-matching
patterns?  Bram, if '\{n\}' *is* kosher for autocmd file-patterns, please
say so in the docs.  Ditto for anything else left out like [:blah:]

If OTOH the docs are not underselling, then the autocmds in filetype.vim
that attempt to use \{n\} and [:blah:] are incorrect and should be replaced.

-Manny

-- 
-- 
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Raspunde prin e-mail lui