On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Benoit Pierre <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 2:57 PM, glts <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Benoit Pierre <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Line number display is not taken into account so the pattern match >>> indicator is misaligned. >>> >>> [...] >> >> Wow, what an obscure feature. There's more to this bug: I can reproduce >> it only when 'number' is set. Otherwise the # flag doesn't show line >> numbers and there is no misalignment. >> >> But the # flag _should_ show the line numbers regardless of 'number'. >> This is ostensibly the same logic as with the :p :# :l commands. > > Indeed! Same with the 'list' (l) flag. Here is an updated patch that > fixes those 2 issues too.
Except it's still not aligned if 'number' was not set, so here is a (hopefully) final version that handle all cases. Cheers, -- A: Because it destroys the flow of conversation. Q: Why is top posting dumb? -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
vim-fix-ex-subst-confirm-prompt.patch
Description: Binary data
