(CC'ing vim-dev)
On Do, 26 Sep 2013, studog wrote:
> On Thursday, September 26, 2013 2:40:47 PM UTC-4, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> > On Do, 26 Sep 2013, studog wrote:
> > > Is this a known issue? Is it fixed in 7.4?
> >
> > When using f/t, Vim gets the following char literally, which means, you
> > don't need <Ctrl-V> here (Since this would mean go to the next <Ctr-V>
> > character). Alternatively, what should also work, is to use <Ctrl-K>CR
> > for entering the digraph character (Character Return).
>
> Okay, known issue. I confirm that "ct" followed by ctrl-m works as I expected
> ctrl-v M to work.
>
> My question now is, why the inconsistency in input mechanisms?
Possibly a vi-compatible thing.
> Why isn't this mentioned in the help?
Would you mind to submit a doc patch?
> Should it be fixed to be consistent with "/" for example?
Well, how would one find a literal <C-V> then?
regards,
Christian
--
Wenn man wirklich ehrlich ist, so ist man überrascht, wie sehr man
sich mitunter doch täuschen kann.
-- H. Bauer
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
