On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 07:01:41 -0400 Michael Henry <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sorry I was not clear. I certainly wasn't trying to break all > mappings :-) I was thinking of and discussing mostly the :map > functionality of Vim, not (yet) the terminal-handling side, and > talking about behavior for a terminal where the codes for <Tab> > key and <C-I> are distinguishable. Yes; in summary this is what I was suggesting. We already have many supported ways to run vim where vim itself /can/ distinguish a <Tab> from a <C-I> (i.e. any of the GUI-related gvims). It would be nice if two maps in a gvim could distinguish properly. Once vim's internals can correctly keep these and all the other similar cases separate /then/ we can consider adding terminal recognition for those terminals that can represent it; but that's a second-stage. You don't need me, or a fancy terminal library to do that. You already have GTK, Win32, etc... GUI input support. You just need to fix vim's internals. -- Paul "LeoNerd" Evans [email protected] ICQ# 4135350 | Registered Linux# 179460 http://www.leonerd.org.uk/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
