On Nov 4, 2013, at 4:23 AM, Bram Moolenaar <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Kazunobu Kuriyama wrote: > >> On Nov 3, 2013, at 11:58 AM, Bram Moolenaar <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote: >>> >>>> I've been chasing this around and around, but on OS X 10.9 I don't get >>>> HAVE_AVAILABILITY_MACROS_H set in os_unix.c, so there's no #include >>>> <AvailabilityMacros.h> and my compile dies withthe following: >>>> >>>> os_unix.c:834:46: warning: declaration of 'struct sigaltstack' will not be >>>> visible outside of this function [-Wvisibility] >>>> extern int sigaltstack __ARGS((const struct sigaltstack *ss, struct >>>> sigaltstack *oss)); >>>> ^ >>>> ./os_unix.h:88:21: note: expanded from macro '__ARGS' >>>> # define __ARGS(x) x >>>> ^ >>>> os_unix.c:834:13: error: conflicting types for 'sigaltstack' >>>> extern int sigaltstack __ARGS((const struct sigaltstack *ss, struct >>>> sigaltstack *oss)); >>>> ^ >>>> /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.9.sdk/usr/include/signal.h:85:5: >>>> note: >>>> previous declaration is here >>>> int sigaltstack(const stack_t * __restrict, stack_t * __restrict) >>>> __DARWIN_ALIAS(sigaltstack); >>>> ^ >>>> 1 warning and 1 error generated. >>>> make: *** [objects/os_unix.o] Error 1 >>> >>> Have you checked in src/auto/config.log why AvailabilityMacros.h is not >>> found? >>> You did do "make reconfigure" or "make distclean”? >> >> Thank you for your work, but unfortunately I have to say this. >> >> The same thing as Hisashi T Fujinaka experienced happened to me, and neither >> re-creation nor cleanup of the autoconf stuff helped me. >> >> The new configure script actually succeeded to detect AvailabilitMacros.h, >> and both of resulting config.log and config.cache acknowledged the existence >> and presence of the header file in question; however, config.status didn’t >> have a line which should look like D[“HAVE_AVAILABILITYMACROS_H"]=“ 1”, >> which was supposed to be placed there automatically by (the product of) >> autoconf. (Again, script re-creation/cleanup couldn't improve the situation >> for me.) >> >> Because of that, config.status failed to define and set >> HAVE_AVAILABILITYMACROS_H to 1 in config.h; instead, it simply added the >> line /* #undef HAVE_AVAILABILITYMACROS_H */ at the very end of the file. >> Too conservative for us to compile os_unix.c. >> >> Consequently, os_unix.c couldn’t be compiled with the latest patch, as >> Hisashi T Fujinaka reported. >> >> Hopefully, this note may help to fix the problem. > > Yeah, it's because of the unusual way AC_CHECK_HEADER() is used. > We should just use AC_CHECK_HEADERS(). Oh my... I thought this sort of mistakes was made only by those who speak a language which doesn't have grammatical plural forms in nouns, like Japanese language, and that European people were free from it. OK, I see again there’s a subtle but big difference between singular and plural forms... :-) -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
