On Sunday, December 1, 2013 12:51:56 PM UTC-6, Ben Fritz wrote:
> :help zd says, "this easily deletes more folds than you expect and there is
> no undo."
>
> But if foldmethod is marker, undo/redo work just fine.
>
> I think this should be clarified to "this easily deletes more folds than you
> expect and there is no undo when foldmethod=manual".
I was going to post a separate post about the behavior in visual mode, but I
realize now it's not a bug, I just misunderstood the help. This should be fixed
too.
Consider text:
one two {{{
three four }}}
five six {{{
seven eight
nine ten {{{
eleven twelve
}}}
Visually select all lines and press zd. All fold markers except for the one
after "nine ten" get removed. This is actually correct since I did not use zD,
I used zd. But the help text says:
"In Visual mode all folds (partially) in the selected area are deleted."
I think this should say:
"In Visual mode one level of all folds (partially) in the selected area are
deleted."
Then it is clearer that you need to use a different command to delete ALL
folds, i.e. use zD instead of zd.
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
