I have just sent out patch 7.4.200, which enables the +visual feature
also in the tiny version.

It doesn't remove any #ifdefs yet, I first want to await comments.
If this looks OK I can remove about 350 occurrences of FEAT_VISUAL.

Enabling +visual doesn't cause a problem for any system, as far as I
know.  The only effect is that the binary becomes a bit bigger.  On my
system (64 bit):

Without +visual:  780312
with +visual:     809112
difference:        28800 or 3.7% bigger

Another thing to drop would be support for 16 bit int.  I wonder if
there still is any such system where current Vim actually works.  These
were Amiga, DOS and Win-16.  But Vim most likely doesn't work there
now anyway.  Last time I tried DOS it didn't fit in memory.

I do not really want to drop support for any system where Vim can
currently be used.  But removing support for systems that don't work
anyway should be fine.

-- 
"Software is like sex... it's better when it's free."
                -- Linus Torvalds, initiator of the free Linux OS
Makes me wonder what FSF stands for...?

 /// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net   \\\
///        sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\  an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org        ///
 \\\            help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org    ///

-- 
-- 
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Raspunde prin e-mail lui