I have just sent out patch 7.4.200, which enables the +visual feature
also in the tiny version.
It doesn't remove any #ifdefs yet, I first want to await comments.
If this looks OK I can remove about 350 occurrences of FEAT_VISUAL.
Enabling +visual doesn't cause a problem for any system, as far as I
know. The only effect is that the binary becomes a bit bigger. On my
system (64 bit):
Without +visual: 780312
with +visual: 809112
difference: 28800 or 3.7% bigger
Another thing to drop would be support for 16 bit int. I wonder if
there still is any such system where current Vim actually works. These
were Amiga, DOS and Win-16. But Vim most likely doesn't work there
now anyway. Last time I tried DOS it didn't fit in memory.
I do not really want to drop support for any system where Vim can
currently be used. But removing support for systems that don't work
anyway should be fine.
--
"Software is like sex... it's better when it's free."
-- Linus Torvalds, initiator of the free Linux OS
Makes me wonder what FSF stands for...?
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.