Christian Brabandt wrote: > Bram, > > On Fr, 07 Mär 2014, Christian Brabandt wrote: > [new :undorecover command] > > Attached is a new patch. It works by restoring each line to the last > known state, which means, the recovered buffer might be inconsistent, > since you basically end up with a mix of undo states. > > Secondly, on any undofile that was written with a non-patched Vim, it > will probably only restore the buffer partly. From the undofile of my > .vimrc (currently containing 402 lines with many lines empty or > commented out) I could recover 50 lines (with about 450 empty lines in > between). > > Therefore this patch makes Vim store one complete buffer content in the > undofile, so recovery will be more useful.
Thanks. I'll have a look at it later. > Bram wrote: > > > Also, this is difficult to test with something under src/testdir. It's > > > probably more suited for a unittest like memfile_test.c does. > > Not sure, how about to do that currently, so I am skipping this part for > now. OK, but we should have some tests before including this patch. -- Living on Earth includes an annual free trip around the Sun. /// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
