Updates:
Status: Started
Owner: [email protected]
Comment #6 on issue 215 by [email protected]: ft=sh highlighting
thinks . is a valid character in variable names.
http://code.google.com/p/vim/issues/detail?id=215
Please try syntax/sh.vim v133, available at my website as
http://www.drchip.org/astronaut/vim/index.html#SYNTAX_SH
I haven't inflicted it on Bram and the broader vim community yet, so I'm
still entertaining feedback on it.
Gary: g:sh_noisk affects whether or not syntax/sh.vim will change isk for
that buffer. When one does a "dw" while atop a foo.bar using ksh, one
wants foo.bar to be deleted, not just the foo or bar. It doesn't affect
shVariable highlighting, as your experiments noted.
ewtoombs: you have a common misperception about the "popularity" of bash vs
ksh; although bash is more common than ksh, posix is largely the same as
ksh, and hence shares (mostly) the same highlighting as does ksh. The
posix shell is also very popular.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
