> Here is an example:
> The original patch does this:
> ,----
> | Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet,
> | consetetur sadipscing elitr,
> | sed
> | Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet,
> | >>consetetur sadipscing elitr,
> | >>sed
> `----
>
> While the second version makes it more like this:
> ,----
> | Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet,
> | consetetur sadipscing elitr,
> | sed
> | Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet,
> |>> consetetur sadipscing elitr,
> |>> sed
> `----
>
> Any opinions on where the 'sbr' should be drawn (should this be put into
> another option)?
I like the first version. Second version does not additionally indent and it is
not good. But it is better make it another option.
I would though ask about tab indent: will
>---Text text text text
be drawn as
>---Text text
>>text text
or as
>---Text text
>--->>text text
(assuming `list listchars=tab:>-` is set)?
>
> Please test this patch and report problems.
>
> Bram, would you be willing to include this feature?
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
