On Saturday, June 14, 2014 10:21:30 AM UTC-4, Christian Wellenbrock wrote:
> On Friday, June 13, 2014 4:39:37 PM UTC+2, Tom McDonald wrote:
> > Here's a recording of a demonstration of the current behaviour:
> >
> > https://asciinema.org/a/10129
>
> I agree that this change is useful and more consistent.
>
> @Tom: In the meantime you could try targets.vim [1] which supports that
> behavior [2].
>
> [1] https://github.com/wellle/targets.vim
> [2] https://github.com/wellle/targets.vim/pull/75
After looking more carefully at Vim's source, I found that current_block() is
only used for (), [], {}, and <>. I see no reason why <> shouldn't be included
in this behaviour, so here's an updated patch that just removes the condition
entirely.
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
diff -r bed71c37618c src/search.c
--- a/src/search.c Thu May 29 14:36:29 2014 +0200
+++ b/src/search.c Mon Jun 16 14:58:51 2014 -0400
@@ -3608,7 +3608,8 @@
/*
* Try to exclude the '(', '{', ')', '}', etc. when "include" is FALSE.
- * If the ending '}' is only preceded by indent, skip that indent.
+ * If the ending '}', ')', or ']' is only preceded by indent, skip that
+ * indent.
* But only if the resulting area is not smaller than what we started with.
*/
while (!include)
@@ -3616,13 +3617,12 @@
incl(&start_pos);
sol = (curwin->w_cursor.col == 0);
decl(&curwin->w_cursor);
- if (what == '{')
- while (inindent(1))
- {
- sol = TRUE;
- if (decl(&curwin->w_cursor) != 0)
- break;
- }
+ while (inindent(1))
+ {
+ sol = TRUE;
+ if (decl(&curwin->w_cursor) != 0)
+ break;
+ }
/*
* In Visual mode, when the resulting area is not bigger than what we
* started with, extend it to the next block, and then exclude again.
