On Friday, June 13, 2014 4:15:26 PM UTC-7, Rob Retter wrote: > Unfortunately, I don't expect that, because I've perceived a strong tendency > in Brad...
Who's Brad? Do you mean Bram? > ... to reflexively reject any bug report that doesn't involve vim actually > crashing. That hasn't been my experience with Bram, assuming that's who you're talking about. He's been very responsive to fix bugs. He's also very careful to not change VIM's expected behavior for the large crowd of current users. His high responsiveness and careful updates are, to a large degree, what makes VIM so well received. I've interacted with Bram off and on over 20 years and all of my interactions with him have been very positive and productive. There have been some "features" that I've suggested that he has rejected, but always for very good reason and I respect his judgement. > Whatever else vim does is, by definition, correct. I don't know where you get this idea, but it just doesn't ring true. -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
