On 2 July 2014, Bram Moolenaar <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Lcd wrote:
>
> > On 1 July 2014, Christian Brabandt <[email protected]> wrote:
> > [...]
> > > BTW: what happens to the highlighting after one changes the
> > > buffer? E.g. if I add a matchaddpos() at line 5, column 5 and
> > > afterwards add a line below 3, will then line 6, column 5 be
> > > highlighted or line 5? Both could be useful, I suppose...
> >
> > As it is now, the highlight stays at line 5, column 5. I think
> > there was a recent patch to make it move along with the text it
> > highlights (which would be a lot more useful, IMO).
>
> No, the position is fixed.
>
> I'm not sure how useful it is to adjust the positions for
> inserted/deleted lines.
[...]
Still, leaving phantom highlights behind is annoying, and definitely
not useful. Can we at least have an option to remove the highlight when
it becomes invalid? This situation is a pain to detect in a script, and
it should be much easier to deal with at the source.
/lcd
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
