Are there any particular criteria for whether a filetype should be included in vim's built-in runfiles?
I have a vroom filetype plugin <https://github.com/google/vim-ft.vroom> with syntax and settings for vroom <https://github.com/google/vroom> script files that I'm thinking about proposing for inclusion. I don't know that it has a lot of users (yet), and the filetype may continue to evolve, but I don't see that being a problem since people can always install the upstream plugin to override the built-in files. I've also run across several other languages that were absent. I saw proto (Google protocol buffers) was recently added, but not textpb (protobuf text format). Also go <https://github.com/jnwhiteh/vim-golang>, soy <https://github.com/duganchen/vim-soy>, dart <https://github.com/dart-lang/dart-vim-plugin>, and vala <https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Vala/Vim?action=AttachFile&do=view&target=vala.vim> have blessed syntax files available but they're not built into vim. Any particular reasons any of those would be a bad fit for including in vim? David -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
