On Thursday, August 7, 2014 1:21:33 PM UTC-7, Gary Johnson wrote:
> On 2014-08-07, dhulme wrote:
> 
> > Sorry, I tried to water down the issue to the point that I failed
> 
> > to demonstrate the issue.
> 
> 
> 
> No problem.  I appreciate the effort.  My "explanation" was more a
> 
> collection of facts than an explanation.  I'll try again here.
> 
> 
> 
> > The issue is:
> 
> > 
> 
> > *** It doesn't load the viminfo at all when I use use -u ***
> 
> 
> 
> That's correct.  My understanding is that it should not, unless the
> 
> file specified by -u sets 'nocompatible' or you also use -N.
> 
> 
> 
> When you use -u, you are putting vim into compatible mode, as I
> 
> wrote before and as explained in ":help -u".
> 
> 
> 
> In compatible mode, vim initializes 'viminfo' to empty.  I can't
> 
> find anyplace where that is stated explicitly, but ":help 'viminfo'"
> 
> says,
> 
> 
> 
>     Vi default: ""
> 
> 
> 
> The Vi default is what you would expect when 'compatible' is set,
> 
> and some experimentation shows it to be true.
> 
> 
> 
> Further in that :help section it says,
> 
> 
> 
>     When non-empty, the viminfo file is read upon startup and
> 
>     written when exiting Vim.
> 
> 
> 
> That implies that when 'viminfo' is empty, the viminfo file is _not_
> 
> read.
> 
> 
> 
> In summary, using -u sets 'viminfo' to empty which causes the
> 
> viminfo file to not be read.
> 
> 
> 
> When you _don't_ use -u, then vim uses several means to determine
> 
> whether it is in compatible or nocompatible mode, including
> 
> detecting the presence of a vimrc file.  (See ":help 'compatible'"
> 
> and ":help compatible-default".)  If vim detects a ~/.vimrc file, it
> 
> will set 'nocompatible'.
> 
> 
> 
> In nocompatible mode on Unix, vim initializes 'viminfo' to
> 
> 
> 
>     '100,<50,s10,h
> 
> 
> 
> This is non-empty.  Therefore, vim reads the viminfo file upon
> 
> startup.
> 
> 
> 
> > What am I missing?
> 
> > 
> 
> > I don't have any global vimrc etc., that I can see.  But if I did,
> 
> > should -u ~/.vimrc change any of that vs. the default option to
> 
> > load ~/.vimrc?
> 
> 
> 
> Yes, as explained above.
> 
> 
> 
> You can see if a system/global vimrc was read by executing
> 
> 
> 
>     :scriptnames
> 
> 
> 
> and looking at the first line or two.
> 
> 
> 
> > This test was done with the following vim:
> 
> > 
> 
> > ----------------------------------------
> 
> > 
> 
> > VIM - Vi IMproved 7.4 (2013 Aug 10, compiled Jun  1 2014 17:05:47)
> 
> > Included patches: 1-316
> 
> > Compiled by <[email protected]>
> 
> 
> 
> The Cygwin vim package doesn't include a system vimrc file.  CentOS
> 
> might.  Fedora does.
> 
> 
> 
> I hope that's clear.
> 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Gary

Very clear.  Not necessarily intuitive, but it makes sense now.  So, by doing:

echo set nocompatible > ~/.vimrc

-u and -i work fine together.

Doh!

-- 
-- 
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Raspunde prin e-mail lui