On Thursday, August 14th, 2014 at 9:17PM, Peter Aronoff wrote:
> I can reproduce this. The patch Daniel sent fixes it, but I believe it
> has a small typo. Daniel, can you compare the patch I'm sending and tell
> me if it fixes the problem. (In the version you sent, there seems to be
> a misplaced closing parenthesis, unless I'm confused.)
Looking at it again, I did misread. Daniel's original version is correct,
though now I'm thinking I want to reread order of operations to decide why
both versions work and under what conditions one would fail.
Bram: In any case, I believe you should pull in Daniel's fix. (If you would
rather me send the full file with the change already present, I can do
that, but not until early next week. I'll be away the next few days.)
Sorry for the initial confusion.
Thanks, Peter
--
We have not been faced with the need to satisfy someone else's
requirements, and for this freedom we are grateful.
Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson, The UNIX Time-Sharing System
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
