Christian wrote: > On So, 31 Aug 2014, [email protected] wrote: > > > As I have read a lot about assumed breakindent bugs in previous threads: > > This > > reminds me of the strange behavior related to line formatting I mentioned > > in the > > vim_use mailing list. It can still be reproduced with the following test. > > > > [email protected], 15.02.2014 02:11: > > > ... it seems that formatting really behaves > > > differently if "linebreak" is set. After setting options with > > > ":se all& co=79 tw=80", place the cursor in the first test line and > > > format both > > > lines with "gqj". Try this with and without "linebreak". > > > > > xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx > > > xxx xxx > > > xxx > > > > > In the first case, there are two words in the second line; in the second > > > case, > > > it is just one word. This can also be reproduced when starting Vim with > > > "vim -u NONE +'se all& co=79 tw=80'". > > > > According to the help page for linebreak, this option should not affect > > formatting. > > Attached is a patch.
Thanks. Can you describe the problem and the fix? -- >From "know your smileys": :-* A big kiss! /// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
