On Wednesday, August 27, 2014 5:32:40 AM UTC+9, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > This looks too simple. There is a remark that the next dict may have > been freed, I think that was there for a good reason (dict containing a > dict). On the other hand, the comment just a few lines up suggests that > this is not possible. I wonder which one of the two comments is > outdated... > > It's possible to pass dd_next to dict_free() (or use an ugly global > variable) and set it to NULL if it gets freed.
I'm thinking: After freed object, starting from top of chain again is too over work. And I'm thinking this should be put on todo list. -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
