Hello itchyny and Bram,
2015/3/11(Wed) 10:07:53 UTC+9 itchyny:
> On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 at 6:59:12 AM UTC+9, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> > Hirohito Higashi wrote:
> >
> > > Oops, I fixed patch and test :-)
> > >
> > > (I could not attached patch, I paste Gist.)
> > > https://gist.github.com/h-east/ffabb0cdd589a5f9acd2
> >
> > Thanks! I wonder if ":tabmove" should work as documented or that the
> > documentation needs to be adjusted. Well, the documentation is already
> > inconsistant, it needs to be fixed anyway.
> >
> > I suppose that since we have ":0tabmove" to move the tab page to the
> > first position, ":$tabmove" is the most logical to move to the last
> > position. Then ":tabmove" without argument just moves it right.
> >
> > I would expect ":.tabmove" to not do anything. But that's not actually
> > useful. So move it to the right, just like ":tabmove"?
> >
> > --
> > Q: How does a UNIX Guru do Sex ?
> > A: unzip;strip;touch;finger;mount;fsck;more;yes;umount;sleep
> >
> > /// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
> > /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
> > \\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
> > \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
>
> Hello, Bram.
>
> I agree with the idea that `:.tabmove` should not move the tab page. The
> command `:.` does
> not move the line, you know. If `:.tabmove` does not move the tabpage, the
> commands
> `:.tabmove`, `:-tabmove`, `:+tabmove` will be consistent with `:.`, `:-`,
> `:+`.
>
> The command `:tabmove` moves the tab page to the last in old Vim (I mean Vim
> before
> 7.4.530). If you change the behaviour, it breaks backward compatibility. Some
> users may
> use `:tabmove` in order to move the tab to the last.
Indeed. That's right.
I consider a specification that is consistent.
$ vim -N -u NONE -p 1 2 3 4 5 -c "tabnext"
LV : Latest Vim (7.4.658) behavior
1 [2] 3 4 5 " Now tab page status. [ ] is current tab page.
(1) :tabm " 1 3 4 5 [2] Backward compatibility ? LV:OK?
(2) :.tabm " 1 [2] 3 4 5 Stay current tab page. LV:NG
(3) :.+tabm " 1 3 [2] 4 5 Move to the right one. LV:NG
(4) :.+1tabm " Same as above. LV:NG
(5) :+tabm " Same as above. LV:NG
(6) :+1tabm " Same as above. LV:NG
(7) :tabm + " Same as above. LV:NG(E474)
(8) :tabm +1 " Same as above. LV:OK
(9) :.-tabm " [1] 2 3 4 5 Move to the left one.
(10) :.-1tabm " Same as above
(11) :-tabm " Same as above. LV:NG
(12) :-1tabm " Same as above. LV:NG
(13) :tabm - " Same as above. LV:NG(E474)
(14) :tabm -1 " Same as above. LV:OK
(15) :0tabm " [2] 1 3 4 5 Move to the first. LV:OK
(16) :tabm 0 " Same as above. LV:OK
(17) :1tabm " 1 [2] 3 4 5 Move to after tab page 1. LV:NG
(18) :tabm 1 " Same as above. LV:NG
(19) :2tabm " 1 [2] 3 4 5 Move to after tab page 2. LV:NG
(20) :tabm 2 " Same as above. LV:NG
(21) :3tabm " 1 3 [2] 4 5 Move to after tab page 3. LV:NG
(22) :tabm 3 " Same as above. LV:NG
(23) :4tabm " 1 3 4 [2] 5 Move to after tab page 4. LV:NG
(24) :tabm 4 " Same as above. LV:NG
(25) :5tabm " 1 3 4 5 [2] Move to the last. LV:OK
(26) :tabm 5 " Same as above. LV:OK
(27) :6tabm " Same as above. LV:OK
(28) :tabm 6 " Same as above. LV:OK
(29) :$tabm " Same as above. LV:OK
(30) :tabm $ " Same as above or E474? LV:OK?
Note. (17)~(24)
My ideal behavior has been along the document.
:help :tabm
> Move the current tab page to after tab page N.
What about this?
Best regards,
Hirohito Higashi (a.k.a h_east)
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
