> * ":.bnext" == go next buffer, > * ":+bnext" == go 2nd next buffer, same as ":.+1bnext". > * ":.wincmd r" == go next window > * ":+wincmd r" == go 2nd next window, same as ":.+1wincmd r" > > Thus it can be said that present ":[.-+]tabmove" behaviors have consistency, > at least, as long as other moving operations.
I reconsidered above, it were not appropriate as analogic command of "tabmove". I'm sorry, but I withdraw it. -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
