On 3/14/2015 5:21 AM, Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
... BTW, it appears that I either mistaken what mq was intended for or
they no longer consider changeset evolution *just* as mq replacement:
new documentation talks about what I thought changeset evolution
should be used for.
And mq is never going away. At some point it may be deprecated in favor
of changeset evolution, but it will always be there.
--
Best regards,
lilydjwg
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
